%20-%20TRANSPARENT2a.png)
Helping others is a noble and selfless endeavor that individuals and groups have practiced for centuries. Charitable organizations are established with the sole purpose of providing aid, support, and resources to those in need. These organizations tackle a wide range of issues, such as poverty, hunger, education, healthcare, and disaster relief.
However, despite their good intentions, charitable organizations face various challenges that hinder their ability to effectively help others. In this article, we will delve into these challenges and explore ways in which we can support and improve the work of charitable organizations.
We are discovering that resource development for support agencies will remain a significant challenge due to “donor fatigue.” This phenomenon occurs when funders become weary or lose interest in backing specific charitable causes.
Each year, funders are inundated with funding requests from agencies striving to make a positive impact in their communities. However, they face tough choices regarding which organizations they believe are making the most meaningful contributions. This competition for funding makes it incredibly challenging for smaller or lesser-known charities to secure the necessary resources.
In recent years, there has been a growing concern over the amount of money that charitable organizations allocate towards overhead costs. Overhead costs include administrative expenses such as staff salaries, rent, and utilities. While these costs are necessary for the smooth operation of an organization, donors sometimes view them as excessive and detracting from the actual cause.
This perception can discourage potential donors and make it harder for charitable organizations to raise funds. However, it is essential to understand that investing in overhead costs is crucial to the long-term sustainability and growth of these organizations.
The expectations of funders are evolving, and many helping agencies may be caught off guard by these changes. Funders increasingly seek assurance that resources are allocated effectively—reaching the right individuals at the right time. There is a growing emphasis on tracking transformation, rather than merely documenting tragedy.
For instance, while funders appreciate that helping agencies are monitoring their efforts to address the needs of long lines of hungry individuals and families, they believe that a more effective solution lies in reducing those lines altogether by working to eradicate food insecurity within the community.
Mario Morino, the author of Leap of Reason, Managing Outcomes in an Era of Scarcity, suggests:
“The cold reality is that in our present era of unsustainable debts and deficits, our nation simply will not be able to justify huge subsidies for social-sector activities and entities without more assurance that they’re on track to realize results.
Public funders—and eventually private funders as well—will migrate away from organizations with stirring stories alone, toward well-managed organizations that can also demonstrate meaningful, lasting impact. It is no longer good enough to make the case that we are addressing real needs. We need to prove that we are making a real difference.”
Across the nation, discussions among social service funders—particularly donors, foundations, and government entities—are evolving. This change is fueled by the What Works Movement, which advocates for the principle: “Let’s determine what truly works and expand its reach to benefit more people.”
Experts emphasize the need for innovative tools that go beyond merely counting the number of programs or individuals served. We must also assess outcomes and impacts—evaluating the successful results of our efforts and the extent to which they transform lives.
So, how can we ascertain whether our initiatives are genuinely effective? Funders believe that communities can answer this question successfully if their support agencies are willing to adjust their approach to helping others. Funders suggest that communities shift from the following:
In today’s complex landscape of social change, embracing four transformative shifts is crucial for better outcomes. Transitioning from reactive strategies to proactive engagement fosters anticipation of community needs while moving from isolated impact to collective impact enhances collaboration for comprehensive solutions. Lastly, focusing on data-driven decision-making ensures efficient resource allocation and builds resilience against ongoing social challenges.
We are observing a shift in funding approaches. Funders now seek to empower agencies and communities to minimize their reliance on external resources and to discover the often-overlooked, abundant wealth of local assets.
Concerns have arisen regarding the lack of communication and collaboration among community support agencies, which leads to inefficient duplication of resources. Funders desire assurance that resourcefulness is being cultivated across three levels of engagement.
I recall a conversation with a Director of Planning and Community Development in Alabama, who expressed deep concern about the sustainability of various programs and services within her community. She mentioned receiving a letter from the federal government indicating a 60% reduction in her community’s HUD funding, along with new stipulations for accessing these funds.
She emphasized that the distribution of funds should not prioritize just one or two assisting agencies. Instead, resources must be allocated evenly among multiple agencies that collaborate effectively. Additionally, she is required to collect data from each agency and generate accurate reports that support a community-focused approach to enhancing residents’ lives.
We found that many assisting agencies focus on tracking specific metrics that demonstrate efficient resource utilization. These metrics are crucial for most grant applications, which demand answers to particular questions aimed at showcasing an agency's effectiveness in addressing genuine community needs.
An agency’s planning and operational framework is referred to as a “logic model,” a tool widely used by helping agencies around the globe. This progressive framework begins with:
However, funders assert that these quantitative measures alone do not capture the **full picture**—they do not adequately reflect the effectiveness of programs or the evidence of lives transformed.
The true effectiveness of a helping agency, and a community, is better defined by Outcomes and Impact Data.
These metrics demonstrate that the resources allocated are making a real and lasting difference in the community. It matters greatly to an agency that its programs are achieving tangible results, as this not only validates the efforts put into their initiatives but also reinforces the importance of their mission.
The ability to showcase successful outcomes helps justify ongoing funding, ensuring that vital services can continue to operate and expand. Furthermore, when staff and volunteers see the positive impact of their work, it acts as a powerful motivator, boosting morale and encouraging them to remain committed to the cause.
This success also plays a crucial role in raising community awareness about the agency's impact, fostering a greater understanding of the issues being addressed. As awareness grows, it can lead to more significant support from outside stakeholders, such as local businesses, government entities, and philanthropic organizations, ultimately contributing to the overall improvement of the community.
I must say that our team is inspired by the dedicated agencies that actively advocate for measuring outcomes and impact. This clearly signals that these organizations are genuinely elevating their efforts and are committed to making a significant difference in addressing poverty, hunger, and other community challenges.
We are encouraged to see communities learning to empower themselves rather than relying solely on external resources. This challenge has led to the development of effective methodologies and capacity-building tools, such as appreciative inquiry and asset-based community development.
These tools aim to help stakeholders recognize and leverage the abundant local assets present in most communities. These assets include:
Tapping into a community's abundant wealth of local assets can:
I propose that helping agencies within a community can easily attract the attention of funders by engaging in Asset-Based Community Development. This approach encourages the discovery of the abundant wealth of local assets and resources already present in the community. By utilizing innovative technology and capacity-building tools, these assets can be connected to work collaboratively for greater impact.
Fostering mutually beneficial partnerships and collaborations will enable these resources to co-create powerful opportunities. Implementing these transformative processes will significantly enhance a community’s resourcefulness, making funders eager to contribute for generations to come.
The journey begins with building relationships with the staff and volunteers of other helping agencies in your community. It’s also beneficial to connect with business leaders eager to invest in transforming lives. Creating opportunities for dialogue and collaboration allows stakeholders to share their concerns and explore ways they can give back. These meaningful connections can then be leveraged for collective action, ultimately maximizing the caring power of the community.
Simply said, a solution for making funders happy is to assure them that you are fully capable of making sure that the right resources, get into the right hands, at the right time. Show funders how you are using data to make better-informed decisions as to where to allocate limited resources where they are most needed.
But don't forget to highlight the community's resourcefulness. It’s essential to showcase the creative and innovative ways that the community is using its existing assets and resources, as this will demonstrate a strong sense of ownership and autonomy. This can be in many forms such as volunteerism, grassroots initiatives, or even leveraging technology for social good.
By showcasing both the need for resources and the community's resourcefulness, funders will see that their contributions are making a significant impact on an already resilient community. They will also be more inclined to support future projects and investments in the community.
Another challenge for helping agencies, also shared by funders, is their inability to clearly define what works and what doesn’t. This is often the by-product of fragmented or siloed service gaps in communities. In my community in Northwest Alabama, a Family Court Judge approached us seeking a solution to his frustration. He was struggling to gather important information about juveniles who came into this courtroom.
His staff’s job was to do research on the background of an individual and get information that could shed light on certain behaviors and acts.
But oftentimes, the staff returned empty-handed because caseworkers at different agencies said that they could not share this information with anyone, even the courts. The judge said, “If I cannot get reliable information, whether it’s good or bad, then I will have a hard time making a good decision about the future of any boy or girl who steps into my courtroom.”
You see, limited information fosters unreliable or faulty assumptions. A fragmented understanding of people’s needs wastes resources and limits results. And, it fosters a short-sighted vision for holistic care.
Mario Morino suggests:
“Despite all the right intentions, the vast majority of nonprofits do not have the benefit of good information and tools to determine where they’re headed, chart a logical course, and course-correct when they’re off. They’re navigating with little more than intuition and anecdotes. Only a fortunate few have a reliable way to know whether they’re doing meaningful, measurable good for those they serve.”
Morino has a quote in his book from David Hunter who is managing partner of Hunter Consulting and a former director of assessment for the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
Hunter suggests, “It is a really, really bad thing for nonprofits to promise to help people improve their lives and prospects . . . and then, when the matter is looked at closely, it turns out that they aren’t doing that at all!”
Now, it is possible for helping agencies to collect and share information safely and securely. Also, HIPPA-compliant standards can be applied to ensure the proper handling of confidential information.
It is now possible for a group of helping agencies to work together with individuals and families — creating a customized path from crisis to sustainability to abundant living. All assistance, referrals, and outcomes can be collectively coordinated and monitored in real-time.
Also, capacity-building scorecards are now available that can evaluate the health, sustainability, and performance of helping agencies. This could really “ramp up” the efficiency and effectiveness of helping agencies.
And for the community, it is now possible to collect and analyze comprehensive metrics from all helping agencies in a community, and this can happen in real-time. Stakeholders often call this “big data” which can clearly define what’s working, and what’s not.
This ability to gather comprehensive metrics, from across the community, revolutionizes the way communities combat poverty, hunger, and other complex challenges.
In conclusion, the power of collaboration and data-sharing among helping agencies can truly make a difference in the lives of those in need. By working together and utilizing technology, we can improve the effectiveness and efficiency of our services, ultimately leading to positive outcomes for individuals and communities.
Let's continue to strive towards a future where no one is left behind, and everyone has access to the resources they need to thrive. Thank you for joining us on this journey towards creating a better world for all. So let's take action now - let's work together to create lasting change! Together, we can make a real impact in the world.
So join us today and be part of the solution! Together, we can create a brighter and more equitable future for all. Let's keep building on this momentum and continue to collaborate, innovate, and empower those in need toward better lives and greater opportunities. Remember, the power of collaboration is limitless – it only takes one person to start making a difference. Will you be that person?
